The recent decision by the National Capital Authority (NCA) to shelve a bronze sculpture of Walter and Marion Griffin, and instead commission a solo statue of Marion Mahony Griffin, has sparked controversy and raised questions about the representation of women in Canberra's commemorative landscapes. While the NCA claims that the projects had different objectives and could co-exist, this decision seems like an over-correction and a missed opportunity to honor the Griffins' legacy together. Personally, I think that the NCA's decision to shelve the bronze sculpture of Walter and Marion Griffin and instead commission a solo statue of Marion Mahony Griffin is a missed opportunity. What makes this particularly fascinating is that it highlights the ongoing struggle to balance the representation of women and men in public art. In my opinion, the NCA's decision to focus solely on Marion Mahony Griffin, while ignoring Walter Griffin, is a reflection of the historical gender imbalance in Canberra's commemorative landscapes. From my perspective, the NCA's decision to shelve the bronze sculpture of Walter and Marion Griffin and instead commission a solo statue of Marion Mahony Griffin is a missed opportunity to honor the Griffins' legacy together. One thing that immediately stands out is that the NCA's decision seems to ignore the fact that Marion Mahony Griffin was overlooked for a century, with Walter taking all the credit for the winning capital design. What many people don't realize is that Marion Mahony Griffin's contributions to the design of Canberra were crucial, and her work was likely overlooked without her husband's reputation. If you take a step back and think about it, the NCA's decision to focus solely on Marion Mahony Griffin, while ignoring Walter Griffin, is a reflection of the ongoing struggle to balance the representation of women and men in public art. A detail that I find especially interesting is that the NCA's decision to shelve the bronze sculpture of Walter and Marion Griffin and instead commission a solo statue of Marion Mahony Griffin seems to contradict its own commitment to addressing the underrepresentation of women in Canberra's commemorative landscapes. What this really suggests is that the NCA's decision is not just about honoring the Griffins' legacy, but also about addressing the gender imbalance in public art. In this context, a sculpture of Marion Mahony Griffin alone seems an over-correction at best. Meanwhile, there's no sculpture yet of Walter Griffin, and the Griffin legacy is still crying out to be recognized in physical form. Personally, I think that the NCA should reconsider its decision and instead commission a bronze sculpture of both Walter and Marion Griffin together. What makes this particularly fascinating is that it would address the gender imbalance in public art and honor the Griffins' legacy as a creative couple. In my opinion, the NCA's decision to shelve the bronze sculpture of Walter and Marion Griffin and instead commission a solo statue of Marion Mahony Griffin is a missed opportunity to create a more balanced and inclusive public art landscape in Canberra.